What is Net Zero?
There is no single definition of “net zero”, so not every target that organisations set is the same. Some talk about becoming “carbon negative” or “climate positive” (in other words, they are removing carbon from the atmosphere). Others talk about becoming “net zero” or “carbon neutral” (they are offsetting their CO2 emissions via other projects, such as tree planting). Others still talk about becoming “climate neutral” (they are referring to all greenhouse gases, not just CO2). This vast array of terminology can be confusing.
What are Scope 1, 2 and 3 Emissions?
When organisations talk about Scope 1 emissions, these are emissions that come directly from their own operations. Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions from the generation of their purchased energy. Scope 3 emissions are emissions from end-users, which these can be much larger than Scope 1 and 2 emissions combined.
How are the SRI portfolios different to the Growth portfolios?
Just because we apply SRI screens to our SRI portfolios, doesn’t mean our other portfolios are invested in companies demonstrating poor practices!
Diligent investors wouldn’t look to invest in companies that have demonstrated poor environmental, social or corporate governance (ESG) standards, as ultimately these businesses are more likely to fail and won’t be around in years to come. Rather, ESG considerations are a fundamental part of our decision-making process, which we incorporate across our portfolios.
If we’re incorporating ESG across the board, why don’t we just amalgamate all our portfolios into one, single SRI strategy?
There are two main reasons for this:
- As advisers and managers, we have a responsibility to offer a range of products to suit our clients’ different financial needs and objectives.
- We’re aware about imposing morality on others, because we believe that everyone has the right to decide what their own values are.
What is fossil divestment and engagement?
Fossil divestment is an investment strategy that involves severing all ties with, selling out of, or refusing to own securities issued by companies that extract and/or produce fossil fuels, as a way of addressing climate change. By rapidly shifting investment away from this sector, and into green technologies and renewable energy sources, fossil divestment aims to put public pressure on fossil fuel companies to improve their environmental performance, while promoting the transition to a low-carbon economy.
What is the history of SRI?
While the modern SRI movement evolved from the political climate of the 1960s, its roots date back to the 18th and 19th centuries – but back then, it was more about being socially conscious:
John Wesley, founder of Methodism, sets out the principles of social investing in his sermon The Use of Money. He invites worshippers and investors not to harm their neighbour through their business practices and to avoid certain industries.
The Methodist Church starts to invest, avoiding companies involved in gambling and alcohol. The Quakers follow suit shortly after, instead avoiding weapons manufacturers.
Development of modern SRI movement including equality for women, civil rights and labour rights. Dr Martin Luther King establishes the model for SRI efforts (e.g. ongoing dialogue, boycotts and direct action targeting specific corporations).
Rev Leon Sullivan develops the Sullivan Principles, which helps to end apartheid in South Africa.
First Ethical Fund
The first retail ethical fund is launched in the US for investors opposed to the Vietnam War.
Increasing awareness of environmental issues following Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez oil spill and Union Carbide.
Investors start considering how companies are making a positive impact.
First UK Ethical Fund
Friends Provident (now BMO) launches its Stewardship range.
It becomes UK law for workplace pension schemes to declare if they took account of any environmental or ethical factors when deciding what stocks to invest in.
The Paris Agreement (aiming to limit global temperature increases to 1.5°C since the Industrial Revolution, by reducing greenhouse gas emissions) is adopted. Today, it has been ratified by 190 countries in developed and developing markets, representing 90% of emissions.
The United Nation launches its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, with the aim of addressing a range of global challenges by 2030.
Governments around the world respond to the challenges of climate change. For example, the UK launches its 10 point plan, the US rolls out its $2 trillion Climate Plan, and China pledges to become carbon neutral by 2060.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report
The IPCC (the United Nations body for assessing the science related to climate change) produces a 4,000 page report showing the Earth’s climate has warmed by 1.2°C since the 1850s, which is worryingly close to the Paris Agreement’s goal. They attribute this increase primarily to unsustainable human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation.
Governments from almost 200 countries come together to agree co-ordinated action to tackle climate change. Many declare they are willing to take action, and are ramping up their efforts – even economies that are heavily reliant on fossil fuels (as producers and users) make noteworthy pledges to become net zero by 2060/70.